Hidushim on Lord of the Rings
Feb. 13th, 2012 07:10 pmI'm re-reading the trilogy again and have some thoughts.
1. The story really suffers from not knowing a pre-transformation Saruman. There's a striking moment where Gandalf is exiled to the top of Orthanc, and he remembers how what is now a prison used to be the place where Saruman would go to look at the stars. I want to know more about that Saruman, who was apparently so trusted by Elrond. It's hard to recreate him from the sneering, rainbow-lycra-cloak wanksta that we meet. Gandalf then looks down and sees that what used to be green and living is now metal and crawling with frightening creatures, a powerful metaphor for Saruman's mind, and one which implies that some part of it is now too held prisoner. But where is it, what is that like at all? I don't think we even ever get a hint.
2. Tom Bombadil is way less bad than I remembered and while the poetry is pretty cringe-worthy, the prose in that section is so rich, and Goldberry is also more puzzling (in a good way) as I read and re-read. I now think that Tom Bombadil gets a bad rap, while on the other hand Bilbo gets way too much credit.
3. I think Sam is a drastically misread character. First, he is clearly a genius: he learnt the alphabet from Bilbo ("meaning no harm" as his father said), and then managed to wrench out reams of information simply from being around educated people and their conversations, poetry, literature, history, Elves and Elvish. Sam is routinely able to give a relevant poem on a random subject when it arises which he memorised simply from hearing it at most a couple of times while tending the garden outside. The others are superficially impressed ("Sam!"), but at the same time are amused and distracted by his funny mannerisms while declaiming poetry, which from Tolkien's description seems to be akin to the way high school kids recite "In Flanders Fields" on Remembrance Day, super awkward, hands behind back, air of overseriousness, etc. Also, their basic impression of Sam doesn't really change in response, they're STILL surprised the next time and Sam STILL is expected to wait on them without a thought: early in the journey, when they arrive in Buckland, four baths are given to the hobbits -- one each for Frodo, Sam, Merry and Pippin, right? No, one is for some dude named Fatty Lumpkin and Sam is presumably fluffing their towels and soaping their loofahs. Does Sam ever get to wash himself? Does he do that while the others are eating? If so when does he get to eat and what? I guess he does this with the servants of Brandy Hall.
The way the narrative is constructed (and plays up Sam's working class mannerisms and speech) also sort of tricks the reader, in that I think most of us come away thinking that the poetry (which he also composes) and fact recital is a sort of quirk of Sam's rather than if you think about it evidence of an intense hunger and ability to learn. He is able to take so much in simply from absorption, which I think accounts for a lot of behaviours which are interpreted as "devoted servant" characteristics rather than his way of educating himself. For example, I think the reason why he goes and sits down nearby when Bilbo and Frodo are having a conversation in Rivendell is because he expected to learn something, as this is the way he did so when he was young. This must also be a strong motivating factor in his decision to go uninvited to the secret Council of Elrond.
Anyway I think Sam's story arc is becoming more attached to and familiar with Frodo for his own self, getting to know his "master" which becomes easier as his sources of knowledge and new information expand greatly, yet his opportunity to learn is severely curtailed by hardship.
tl;dr It doesn't surprise me that a literally starving, aching person travelling almost 24/7 in an evil land on a mission of life and death, who is able to bust out a perfectly-remembered poem about elephants the first time he ever sees one (while it is busy killing people), is also the future ruler of Hobbiton.
1. The story really suffers from not knowing a pre-transformation Saruman. There's a striking moment where Gandalf is exiled to the top of Orthanc, and he remembers how what is now a prison used to be the place where Saruman would go to look at the stars. I want to know more about that Saruman, who was apparently so trusted by Elrond. It's hard to recreate him from the sneering, rainbow-lycra-cloak wanksta that we meet. Gandalf then looks down and sees that what used to be green and living is now metal and crawling with frightening creatures, a powerful metaphor for Saruman's mind, and one which implies that some part of it is now too held prisoner. But where is it, what is that like at all? I don't think we even ever get a hint.
2. Tom Bombadil is way less bad than I remembered and while the poetry is pretty cringe-worthy, the prose in that section is so rich, and Goldberry is also more puzzling (in a good way) as I read and re-read. I now think that Tom Bombadil gets a bad rap, while on the other hand Bilbo gets way too much credit.
3. I think Sam is a drastically misread character. First, he is clearly a genius: he learnt the alphabet from Bilbo ("meaning no harm" as his father said), and then managed to wrench out reams of information simply from being around educated people and their conversations, poetry, literature, history, Elves and Elvish. Sam is routinely able to give a relevant poem on a random subject when it arises which he memorised simply from hearing it at most a couple of times while tending the garden outside. The others are superficially impressed ("Sam!"), but at the same time are amused and distracted by his funny mannerisms while declaiming poetry, which from Tolkien's description seems to be akin to the way high school kids recite "In Flanders Fields" on Remembrance Day, super awkward, hands behind back, air of overseriousness, etc. Also, their basic impression of Sam doesn't really change in response, they're STILL surprised the next time and Sam STILL is expected to wait on them without a thought: early in the journey, when they arrive in Buckland, four baths are given to the hobbits -- one each for Frodo, Sam, Merry and Pippin, right? No, one is for some dude named Fatty Lumpkin and Sam is presumably fluffing their towels and soaping their loofahs. Does Sam ever get to wash himself? Does he do that while the others are eating? If so when does he get to eat and what? I guess he does this with the servants of Brandy Hall.
The way the narrative is constructed (and plays up Sam's working class mannerisms and speech) also sort of tricks the reader, in that I think most of us come away thinking that the poetry (which he also composes) and fact recital is a sort of quirk of Sam's rather than if you think about it evidence of an intense hunger and ability to learn. He is able to take so much in simply from absorption, which I think accounts for a lot of behaviours which are interpreted as "devoted servant" characteristics rather than his way of educating himself. For example, I think the reason why he goes and sits down nearby when Bilbo and Frodo are having a conversation in Rivendell is because he expected to learn something, as this is the way he did so when he was young. This must also be a strong motivating factor in his decision to go uninvited to the secret Council of Elrond.
Anyway I think Sam's story arc is becoming more attached to and familiar with Frodo for his own self, getting to know his "master" which becomes easier as his sources of knowledge and new information expand greatly, yet his opportunity to learn is severely curtailed by hardship.
tl;dr It doesn't surprise me that a literally starving, aching person travelling almost 24/7 in an evil land on a mission of life and death, who is able to bust out a perfectly-remembered poem about elephants the first time he ever sees one (while it is busy killing people), is also the future ruler of Hobbiton.